Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 1|回復: 0

Current scenario and prospects for energy: some ideas to think about in the l...

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 2024-3-7 18:30:33 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

In, ninety years have passed since the approval by the parliament of the second republic of the law on agrarian reform. This was one of the central issues of spanish politics in the years and yet, in those years, the world was already moving fully towards a production system based on electricity and oil. At this time, with digital revolution in the form of the third industrial revolution in full swing and as a great structural challenge of our economy, paradoxically we once again find that the challenge of electrifying the economy and designing the rules to produce and reward said electrical energy is becoming a central issue in spanish politics. The level of confrontation that the issue of energy regulation, and electricity in particular, will never be the same as the redistribution of land ownership in 1932, but it will undoubtedly strongly condition the political debate in the coming years, and not only in spain. We are already seeing the first signs of it.

As in  in relation to the agrarian reform, there is a Italy Telegram Number Data  certain basic consensus: at that time the consensus was based on the need to make the land more productive than it was, and now it is the need to decarbonize the system primary and secondary energy which, in practice, basically consists of its electrification through the use of renewable generation sources. The problem of structural transitions is to determine how its cost is distributed and who compensates those affected by the transition. What, in 1932, was the debate on expropriation without compensation is now the debate on the remuneration of inframarginal technologies in a marginal market. But the question can be simplified: how is the transition paid? And here we find the first fundamental problem. Political and business leaders have for years moved the erroneous message that said transition has no cost.



The common citizens are very much in favor of the energy transition, but they are not aware of the cost that they will have to pay (economic and environmental). That does not happen with other infrastructures such as transport or health where the debate is much more mature and therefore more adjusted to the rules of democracy. To make the energy transition, new production facilities must be built, dismantling many of the existing ones; distribute that energy with much more expensive networks than the current ones; and to support a production system that is naturally very unstable with technologies that are immature and very expensive today. All this requires huge investments.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|v

GMT+8, 2024-4-29 13:55 , Processed in 1.319162 second(s), 18 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |